REVIEW OF REGIONAL GOVERNANCE MODEL (2006) In 1966, the BC government established the “regional district” concept of local government in hopes of dealing with problems that transcended traditional municipal boundaries. These regional governments operate throughout the province as a local form of government, governed by the Local Government Act of BC. Prior to the introduction of the regional district, land use and planning were done directly by the BC government, whereas local services (such as fire protection and water management) were provided by independently incorporated improvement districts or municipalities under contract with the province.
Today, there are 154 municipalities in BC, plus 27 regional districts. Most regional districts inhabit primarily unincorporated rural areas (electoral areas). However, some urban areas, which have been deemed regionally unregulated because of numerous neighbouring municipalities, have become dependent on regional districts for certain regional responsibilities. In the Provincial Capital area alone, there are 13 municipalities with one encompassing Capital Regional District, serving a population of over 334,000. The Greater Vancouver Regional District involves 21 municipalities and serves a population of over two million.
The purpose of regional districts is three-fold: they are regional governments that deliver regional services; they are inter-municipal and provide a political and administrative framework for the delivery of services on a partnership basis; and they can offer local government services for unincorporated areas.
The CRD and GVRD are both somewhat considered regional district anomalies because of their highly-populated urban areas. In these two districts, the regional governments primarily provide fully regional services like water supply and air quality management. In contrast, less populated regional districts are more focused on providing local services like planning, and fire protection. While both the CRD and GVRD share regional problems, they are dealt with quite differently by the province. Most notably, accessing capital and transportation management are two key issues handled legislatively in a different way from one another.
In 1988, the Legislature adopted the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Act, which was the result of extensive negotiations between the province and the GVRD. This was significant in a number of respects: it gave the GVRD new powers in transit, major roads, air care and Transportation Demand Management; and provided revenue sources to match. Significantly, it removed hospital financing as a regional district responsibility as one of the swaps necessary to achieve a balanced and mutually acceptable package. In contrast, the CRD, which is experiencing significant transportation challenges, has no governing transportation body overlooking the region.
The Municipal Finance Authority Act was created in 1971 and took advantage of the emergence of regional districts and mandated that all municipalities - with the exception of the City of Vancouver and special boards - had to borrow through their regional districts. This allowed local governments, through their regional districts, to pool their assets and borrowing requests and collectively approach the marketplace producing benefits in lower borrowing costs. Thus, while the CRD’s primary city, Victoria, must borrow money through its regional district, the GVRD’s primary city, Vancouver, is not mandated to do the same.
Greater Vancouver’s unique agreements with the province have allowed some of its main issues to be largely mitigated. Particular areas of BC have grown and will continue to grow at unprecedented rates since the establishment of regional districts, including the CRD, Regional District of Central Okanagan, Regional District of Nanaimo, and Regional District of Fraser-Fort George. As these urbanized regions escalate, they may also benefit from similar agreements that the province holds with the GVRD.
One issue of concern to residents in urban areas is the question of representation on regional district boards. Residents of electoral areas elect a representative to sit on the regional district board. Meanwhile, representation of municipal areas on the district’s Board of Directors is supposedly ensured by directors who are members of municipal council and appointed by their councils for terms of three years. In other words, municipal voters have no direct voice in deciding which of their elected representatives will be on their regional district’s Board of Directors.
It appears the Regional Governance model does not serve the majority of districts well. The fine-tuning of the Regional Governance Structure to meet the needs of particular areas is too short term an approach and longer term solutions are required. The Regions need to be treated fairly and appropriately and a review of this important Governing Body and its role is needed.
THE CHAMBER RECOMMENDS
That the Provincial Government review its concept of regional districts and their roles and the manner in which representatives are selected.
